I actually think in their heart of hearts all biologists want to be mad scientists. The problem is
that theyâre really bad at it. You try attaching a chimpâs head to a man â thatâs, what, half a
casualty? Thatâs nothing! Even if you put the tinfoil hat on and say, ah, but lab leaks and viruses
and whatnot â if weâre going to rank the sciences on their ability to do a pandemic, covid isnât a
particularly good showing when all most people under 90 remember of it is being really bored,
sticking uncomfortable Q-tips up their nose, and baking sourdough bread.
Theyâre in dead last because of all the sciences in this list, biology has the largest
negative kill count, having saved billions of lives and thus making themselves known as
utterly incompetent at being evil.
Like biologists, every astronomer dreams of waking up to an imminent asteroid impact. (This isnât a
particularly secret ambition, either.) Theyâve read and written all the sci-fi lit there is, and
theoretically have a pretty good grasp on how to destroy the world.
Unfortunately when a mad astronomer says the world will end it carries the same tenor
and believability of that snotty-nosed kid on the playground saying his uncle works for Nintendo. A
gamma-ray burst will end all life on Earth? Whenâs that, sweetie? Oh?
Two trillion years from now? Thatâs nice, dear. Ooooh, an asteroid that has a 0.001% chance of
passing by the moon? Terrifying.
If they really wanted to, the computer scientists definitely could kill everyone and break
all electronics forever. Unfortunately theyâd be out of a job if they did that, so i
donât think we have much to worry about.
The good news for sociologists is that they are, genuinely, completely fucking insane. The bad news
is that they donât even know how to write a paper with replicable results, let alone take over the
world. If they ever figure out how to distinguish a fake article about toxic masculinity in dog
parks from a real article about toxic masculinity in dog parks they might move up a bit in the
ranks.
This is actually a statistical error caused by Spiders Noam and should be ignored.
Psychologists have really fallen off since the initial publication of the
HaberâHaber Scale of Scientific Evil back in 1932. They used to rip monkeys from their
families and put them in cages, get people to administer lethal electric shocks, put people in
prison for the lulz â now, alas, they seem content to let their perfectly developed evil skillset go
to waste and futz around figuring out how to make people subscribe to emails instead. Sad!
Chemists are great at doing evil. They can make poisons, kill people with radiation, pretend
âÎą-(5,6-Dimethylbenzimidazolyl)cobamidcyanideâ is a
totally normal thing to say â the list goes on! The main thing bringing them down is that they donât
seem at all interested in doing evil. They know the nega-utils from working at big
pharmaceutical companies are going to the economists here, right?
Ah, physics, the âfuck around and find outâ of the sciences, whose practitioners never met a death,
destroyer of worlds they didnât like. Ever since the atom bomb theyâve been a consistent presence in
the upper tier, and itâs not hard to see why. Even when theyâre not literally killing millions,
theyâre sticking heads in particle accelerators, developing new and innovative ways to undo the
fundamental forces of the universe, and causing chaos among the general population by convincing
them their collider would destroy the universe. Their fourth place position says more about the
quality of those who ranked ahead of them than any faults of physics specifically.
Mathematicians are barely holding on to their humanity. They havenât seen the sunlight in days. They
think quantum physics is just too soft and people-y. In this lies their danger: the possibility that
they might snap.
Take Grigori Perelman, a mild example. He was a prodigy, proving conjectures that had stood unproven
for hundreds of years â and then, at the apex of his career, the million-dollar prize⌠he just
stopped. He just left the field, became a hermit, and was never seen again. Mr Perelmanâs story is
the best-case scenario.
The worst-case scenario? Well â the real reason mathematics is so high is that they have the dubious
distinction of being the only field on this list to have spawned an
actual terrorist. If it were up
to me, iâd keep the mathematicians under 24/7 CCTV surveillance.
Self-explanatory.
Geologists? What? Surely theyâd be at the bottom: all they do is study rocks!
That was my thinking too. But then i thought about it. And thought about it. And uncovered the dark
secret of geology. No, they canât make earthquakes happen on demand, or turn themselves into lava.
Thatâs theory. But what of applied geology?
Applied geology has other names. Chief among them: mining, fracking, and drilling. The geologist
plan is a slow burn. They dig, and dig, and dig, guzzling up all the coal and oil they can muster,
spewing their flames into the atmosphere. And by the time anyone noticed⌠it wasnât their problem
anymore. Oh, they say, thatâs not us, thatâs Nasa, thatâs the biologists, thatâs the economists, it
could never be us humble innocent rock nerds. But they know. They know, deep down, that when the
last forest burns itself up, when the last city falls into the sea â the geologists will look over
the rubble, and the geologists will be king.
